Talk:Como Bluff

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Wyoming Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Wyoming portal This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming (assessed as Mid-importance).

Expert Needed

I wikified the link to the Dakota Formation in the article, but that same article claims: Clearly, then, these western sediments are equivalent to the Dakota Formation of the Great Plains, but are not the same strata. For this reason, the term Cloverly Formation has been expanded to include sediments formerly called Dakota Formation in Wyoming. So, should we be calling the formation the Dakota Formation, or the Cloverly Formation? - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 02:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the following publication from the Wyoming Geological Survey: http://www.wsgs.uwyo.edu/pubs/PIC/pic-27_b.pdf Page 9 has a cross section at Como Bluffs. On p. 8 it says: Como Bluffs is an eroded southeast - plunging anticline with a high-angle reverse fault on the northwestern flank (Figure 5) . The steep face of the bluffs is not visible from the dinosaur-bone cabin area. Viewed down the road, from the southwest, the bluffs form hogbacks capped by the south-dipping Muddy Sandstone (a sandstone unit that in some parts of Wyoming replaces the upper part of the Thermopolis Shale) and the conglomeratic sandstones of the Cloverly Formation. Anky-man 19:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Como Bluff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]